Abstract
The purpose of this study was to explore which communication channels consumers are more likely to use when they want to provide feedback or acquire information about high-stake and low-stake brands. This research relies on the results of a survey and an analysis of the literature to gather findings. Results suggest that consumers prefer to talk more about high-stake brands than low-stake brands. They also show that consumers are more inclined to use face-to-face, Facebook, and websites to communicate experiences and acquire information about brands than other evaluated communication channels. Finally, consumers are more likely to express negative experiences than positive experiences or questions. Findings of this research provide insights to enhance the consumer-brand interactions in brand communications.
Library of Congress Subject Headings
Consumer behavior; Branding (Marketing); Mass media--Psychological aspects; Social media--Psychological aspects
Publication Date
11-18-2015
Document Type
Thesis
Student Type
Graduate
Degree Name
Communication and Media Technologies (MS)
Department, Program, or Center
School of Communication (CLA)
Advisor
Patrick Scanlon
Advisor/Committee Member
David Neumann
Advisor/Committee Member
Adriana Bóveda-Lambie
Recommended Citation
Rondon Diplan, Carolina, "Consumers’ Communication Channels Preferences: High-Stake Versus Low-Stake Brands" (2015). Thesis. Rochester Institute of Technology. Accessed from
https://repository.rit.edu/theses/8934
Campus
RIT – Main Campus
Plan Codes
COMMTCH-MS
Comments
Physical copy available from RIT's Wallace Library at HF5415.32 .R66 2015