Abstract
I once heard a female animator say that giving birth to her child was easier than making a film. Making an animation is indeed a very long and arduous task. It takes both the craftsmanship of an artist and the skill of a technician. The making of my film, Chinchi and Eleanor, was no different. It is difficult to explain to the average person exactly how a film is made. Every artist has their own practices, some useful and some just old habits. Animators generally keep to a set of methods that were handed down from the animators before them. My film-making process was similar to the way other films were made, but each experience is unique to the artist. Although computer animation is highly technical the film-making process is still very organic. No two people will share the same path. Whether a film is successful or not is really hard to say. I obviously wanted my film to be successful but unlike the "fine" arts, much of an animation's success is determined by the audience. This can be a disconcerting when your only aim is to please the viewer. It was for this reason I mostly just tried to push my skills to the next level. I wanted to perfect some of my old "tried and true" techniques as well as create some innovative methods. The idea was to create a pleasing film for others but even if I for some reason fell short, I knew that at least I would have progressed my skill level in the process. As an artist, that is all one can really hope for.
Library of Congress Subject Headings
Computer animation--Technique; Computer animation--Themes, motives; Animation (Cinematography); Animation--Themes, motives; Chinchillas--Drama
Publication Date
3-1-2010
Document Type
Thesis
Department, Program, or Center
School of Film and Animation (CIAS)
Advisor
Gasek, Tom
Recommended Citation
Cone, Jonathan, "Chinchi and Eleanor" (2010). Thesis. Rochester Institute of Technology. Accessed from
https://repository.rit.edu/theses/6384
Campus
RIT – Main Campus
Comments
Note: imported from RIT’s Digital Media Library running on DSpace to RIT Scholar Works. Physical copy available through RIT's The Wallace Library at: TR897.7 .C66 2010