Abstract
This thesis presents a history of United States telecommunications regulation in the 20th Century with a view toward explaining the economic motivations of the involved parties and exploding economic myths such as "natural monopoly" and "cross subsidization" by the application of common sense. The relative success and failure of antitrust and economic regulation are analyzed on a subjective but quantitative scale, with antitrust regulation as the clear winner in terms of the author's standard of "public interest." The thesis examines specific economic incentives resulting directly from economic regulation, in particular, rate-of- return regulation and the FCC's interpretations of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, that has caused uneconomic investments and conduct which is contrary to the public interest. Suggestions are made for changes in regulatory principles and specific actions to improve the results of economic regulation.
Library of Congress Subject Headings
Telecommunication policy--United States; Telecommunication--Law and legislation--United States; Telecommunication policy--United States--History
Publication Date
2001
Document Type
Thesis
Department, Program, or Center
Information Sciences and Technologies (GCCIS)
Advisor
Fulle, Ron
Advisor/Committee Member
Hartpence, Bruce
Recommended Citation
Sayre, Gregg, "Regulatory distortions of local exchange telecommunications infrastructure" (2001). Thesis. Rochester Institute of Technology. Accessed from
https://repository.rit.edu/theses/232
Campus
RIT – Main Campus
Comments
Note: imported from RIT’s Digital Media Library running on DSpace to RIT Scholar Works. Physical copy available through RIT's The Wallace Library at: HE7781 .S297 2001