Abstract
This thesis explores how bold and unconventional architectural designs are first rejected and later embraced by the public. Through a comparative study of the Sydney Opera House, the Louvre Pyramid, and the Walt Disney Concert Hall, it examines how public opinion shifts over time. Using media reports, interviews, and public comments, the study tracks emotional responses (positive, neutral, or negative) assigned a score to measure change over the years. The research applies Everett Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovation Theory to explain this shift in five stages: knowledge, persuasion, decision, implementation, and confirmation. Each building faced early backlash, but eventually became a cultural icon. The thesis shows that public resistance to new ideas is common, but with time, understanding, and use, these designs can inspire pride and reshape how we experience architecture. It offers insight into how creativity, even when controversial, can lead to lasting social and cultural value.
Library of Congress Subject Headings
Architecture, Modern--20th century; Architecture, Modern--21st century; Architecture and society
Publication Date
7-2025
Document Type
Thesis
Student Type
Graduate
Degree Name
Architecture (M.Arch.)
Department, Program, or Center
Architecture, Department of
College
Golisano Institute for Sustainability
Advisor
None provided
Recommended Citation
Plancarte, Odaly, "Unique Architecture: In Praise of Paradox Persistence" (2025). Thesis. Rochester Institute of Technology. Accessed from
https://repository.rit.edu/theses/12287
Campus
RIT – Main Campus
Plan Codes
ARCH-MARCH
