Abstract
As space exploration technology advances and more private actors engage in independent space activities, national governments and international organizations need to reform and modernize their approach to regulating private space activities in order to better capture and distribute the benefits of those activities. This paper examines several disparate suggestions and ideas found in 38 articles ranging from current space policy literate to international treaties in order to generate four possible policy approaches to private space activities: the Status Quo, Self-Regulation, New International Treaties and Expanded Public-Private Partnership models. It then compares and contrasts these four alternatives to determine which can co-exist, which are mutually exclusive and offer a policy recommendation for resolving the current deadlock in international space policy. Ultimately, governments need to work in close partnerships with their national private space sectors to better regulate those sectors on a nation-by-nation basis now, while new space treaties and policies are created to better deal with the emerging future of private space activities.
Library of Congress Subject Headings
Astronautics--International cooperation; Space law; Conflict of laws--Private companies
Publication Date
12-15-2021
Document Type
Thesis
Student Type
Graduate
Degree Name
Science, Technology and Public Policy (MS)
Department, Program, or Center
Public Policy (CLA)
Advisor
Eric Hittinger
Advisor/Committee Member
Qing Miao
Advisor/Committee Member
Mihail Barbosu
Recommended Citation
Yaeger, Henry, "Analyzing the Arguments and Opinions Surrounding Space Privatization" (2021). Thesis. Rochester Institute of Technology. Accessed from
https://repository.rit.edu/theses/11076
Campus
RIT – Main Campus
Plan Codes
STPP-MS